|
Nonlinear optics has numerous applications in communications
and optical computing, as nonlinear material effects allow for the design of switches,
couplers, modulators, and all-optical signal processing systems. Nonlinear optics also
has a number of inherent benefits, such as the ability to compensate for
dispersion and diffraction effects, as evidenced by temporal and spatial solitons.
The idea of combining nonlinear effects with photonic crystals has attracted much
attention, since the light guiding and confining properties of the PC structures allow
for possible circuit integration. Slow-light enhancement of nonlinear effects in
photonic crystal waveguides is also useful when the nonlinear properties of an
otherwise desirable material are relatively weak.
The development of a suitable simulation tool for nonlinear
optics is crucial if such effects and their applications are ever to be studied. The
most common technique is the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, although such approximate
techniques are inherently inadequate for describing systems with intricate features
over relatively short small lengths, such as photonic crystals. The finite-difference
time-domain (FDTD) method of analysis, however, is applicable for a wide range of
generalized structures, constrained only by the size of the computational space
required for the simulation. Therefore, we have developed our own nonlinear extension
to the original linear FDTD method, which is suitable for simulating materials
exhibiting anisotropic, χ(2), and χ(3)
nonlinearities. Better than 95% accuracy was calculated for the
χ(3) code, with similar results expected for the anisotropic and
χ(2) codes.
In order to verify correct operation of the code, two types of
simulations were performed for the well-understood nonlinear optics examples of
self-focusing of optical beams in χ(3) nonlinear media and
second-harmonic generation in χ(2) media. In these simulations,
a bulk of nonlinear material is excited using a Huygens’ source originating from
within a slab waveguide. In the figure below, the field profile is shown for the case
of a bulk χ(3) material of normalized χ(3)
= 1 that is excited by a source on the left side propagating from left to right. A
qualitative examination of the diagram indicates that the lensing effect of the
material focuses an initially divergent beam, causing it to converge by the time is
has propagated to the end of the computational domain.
|
|
Next, the TM and TE field profiles for a slab of bulk
χ(2) material are shown the next figure, where the normalized
χ(2) = 10. The TM field (a) is used to excite the material and
the stimulated response shows up in the TE field (b). Again, examining the diagrams
qualitatively indicates that a second-harmonic field is generated in the TE field
(orthogonal to the TM excitation) and the energy is transferred periodically between
the two, as expected. Of course, the energy conversion is not 100%, since there is a
mismatch in the group velocities of the TE and TM polarizations due to waveguide
dispersion. Also, the null on the axis seen in the second-harmonic field is due to
the fact that the transverse magnetic field of the fundamental component has even
symmetry and therefore its electric field must vanish on the axis.
|