Cognitive Radio Networks

Project Descriptions



Architecture for Cognitive Radio Networks

Current wireless network environment employs heterogeneity in terms of both spectrum policy and communication technologies. Hence, a clear description of the cognitive radio network architecture is crucial for development of communication protocols.

Figure 1. Cognitive radio network architecture.

The components of the cognitive radio network architecture, as shown in Figure 1, can be classified in two groups as the primary network and the cognitive network. Primary network is referred to as the legacy network that has an exclusive right to a certain spectrum band. On the contrary, cognitive network does not have a license to operate in the desired band. The basic elements of the primary and unlicensed networks are defined as follows:

  • Primary User: Primary user has a license to operate in a certain spectrum band. This access can be only controlled by its base-station and should not be affected by the operations of any other unauthorized user.
  • Primary Base-Station: Primary base-station is a fixed infrastructure network component which has a spectrum license. In principle, the primary base-station does not have any cognitive radio capability for sharing spectrum with cognitive radio users. However, primary base-station may be required to have both legacy and cognitive radio protocols for the primary network access of cognitive radio users.
  • Cognitive Radio User:Cognitive radio user has no spectrum license. Hence, the spectrum access is allowed only in an opportunistic manner. Capabilities of the cognitive radio user include spectrum sensing, spectrum decision, spectrum handoff and cognitive radio MAC/routing/transport protocols. The cognitive radio user is assumed to have the capabilities to communicate with not only the base-station but also other cognitive radio users.
  • Cognitive Radio Base-Station: Cognitive radio base-station is a fixed infrastructure component with cognitive radio capabilities. Cognitive radio base-station provides single hop connection to cognitive radio users without spectrum access license.

As shown in Figure 1, cognitive radio users can either communicate with each other in a multihop manner or access the base-station. Thus, in our cognitive radio network architecture, there are three different access types over heterogeneous networks, which show different implementation requirements as follows:
  • Cognitive Radio Network Access: Cognitive radio users can access their own cognitive radio base-station both in licensed and unlicensed spectrum bands. Since all interactions occur inside the cognitive radio network, their medium access scheme is independent of that of primary network.
  • Cognitive Radio Ad Hoc Access: Cognitive radio users can communicate with other cognitive radio users through ad hoc connection on both licensed and unlicensed spectrum bands. Also cognitive radio users can have their own medium access technology.
  • Primary Network Access:The cognitive radio user can access the primary base-station through the licensed band, if the primary network is allowed. Unlike other access types, cognitive radio users should support the medium access technology of primary network. Furthermore, primary base-station should support cognitive ardio capabilities.

Related work:

  • I. F. Akyildiz, W. Y. Lee, M.C. Vuran and S. Mohanty, "NeXt Generation / Dynamic Spectrum Access / Cognitive Radio Wireless Networks: A Survey,"Computer Networks Journal (Elsevier), Vol. 50, pp. 2127-2159, September 2006
  • I. F. Akyildiz, W. Y. Lee, M.C. Vuran and S. Mohanty, "A Survey on Spectrum Management in Cognitive Radio Networks," IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 46, pp. 40-48, Apr. 2008.

 


Spectrum Management Framework for Cognitive Radio Networks

CR networks impose unique challenges due to the coexistence with primary networks as well as diverse QoS requirements. Thus, new spectrum management functions are required for CR networks with the following critical design challenges:

  • Interference Avoidance: CR network should avoid interference with primary networks.
  • QoS Awareness: In order to decide an appropriate spectrum band, CR networks should support QoS-aware communication, considering dynamic and heterogeneous spectrum environment.
  • Seamless Communication: CR networks should provide seamless communication regardless of the appearance of the primary users.

Figure 2. Spectrum Management Framework.

In order to address these challenges, we provide a directory for different functionalities required for spectrum management in CR networks. The spectrum management process consists of four major steps:

  • Spectrum Sensing: A CR user can only allocate an unused portion of the spectrum. Therefore, the CR user should monitor the available spectrum bands, capture their information, and then detect the spectrum holes.
  • Spectrum Decision: Based on the spectrum availability, CR users can allocate a channel. This allocation not only depends on spectrum availability, but it is also determined based on internal (and possibly external) policies.
  • Spectrum Sharing: Since there may be multiple CR users trying to access the spectrum, CR network access should be coordinated in order to prevent multiple users colliding in overlapping portions of the spectrum.
  • Spectrum Mobility: users are regarded as visitors to the spectrum. Hence, if the specific portion of the spectrum in use is required by a primary user, the communication needs to be continued in another vacant portion of the spectrum.

The spectrum management framework for CR network communication is illustrated in Fig. 2. It is evident from the significant number of interactions that the spectrum management functions necessitate a cross-layer design approach. Thus, each spectrum management function cooperates with application, transport, routing, medium access and physical layer functionalities with taking into consideration the dynamic nature of the underlying spectrum.

Related work:

  • I. F. Akyildiz, W. Y. Lee, M.C. Vuran and S. Mohanty, "NeXt Generation / Dynamic Spectrum Access / Cognitive Radio Wireless Networks: A Survey," omputer Networks Journal (Elsevier), Vol. 50, pp. 2127-2159, September 2006.
  • F. Akyildiz, W. Y. Lee, M.C. Vuran and S. Mohanty, " Survey on Spectrum Management in Cognitive Radio Networks," IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 46, pp. 40-48, Apr. 2008.

 


Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radio Networks

A cognitive radio should monitor the available spectrum bands, capture their information, and then detect the spectrum holes. Hence, spectrum sensing is a key enabling technology in cognitive radio networks. In spectrum sensing, the detection accuracy has been considered as the most important factor to determine the performance of cognitive radio networks.

However, in reality, RF frontend of CR users cannot differentiate the primary user signals and CR user signals. In case of the energy detection, widely used in spectrum sensing, transmission and sensing cannot be performed at the same time. Thus, during the sensing(observation time), all CR users should stop their transmissions and keep quiet. Due to this hardware restriction, CR users should sense the spectrum periodically with sensing period Ts and observation time ts, as described in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Periodic spectrum sensing strcuture.

However, the periodic spectrum sensing should consider following design issues:

  • Interference Avoidance: In the periodic sensing, interference is related to not only sensing accuracy depending on observation time but also the CR transmission time and tarffic statistics.
  • Spectrum Efficiency: The main objective of cognitive radio is the efficient use of spectrum resources. However, since CR users cannot not transmit during the sensing, spectrum efficiency will be degraded in evitably.

In Cognitive radio network, available spectrums may show different characteristics with the bandwidth, the primary user activity, and acceptable interference limit, which affect both the sensing accuracy and spectrum efficiency. Thus, spectral efficient sensing technique is essential for cognitive radio networks. Hence, in this project we will propose the spectral efficient sensing technique for cognitive radio networks, which provides optimal spectrum sensing period and observation time to maximize the efficiency of each spectrum bands subject to the resource limitation and interference restriction.

Related work:

  • W. Y. Lee, and I. F. Akyildiz, "Optimal Spectrum Sensing Framework for Cognitive Radio Networks," IEEE Transaction on Wireless Communications, Oct. 2008.

 


Spectrum Decision Framework for Cognitive Radio Networks

In cognitive radio (CR) networks, unused spectrum bands will be spread over a wide frequency range including both unlicensed and licensed bands. These unused spectrum bands detected through spectrum sensing show different characteristics according to the radio environment. Since CR networks can have multiple available spectrum bands having different channel characteristics, they should be capable of selecting the proper spectrum bands according to the application requirements, called spectrum decision. In this project, we propose an application-adaptive spectrum decision method over heterogeneous spectrum bands. At first, each spectrum band is characterized for the spectrum decision, based on not only local observations of CR users but also statistical information of primary networks. Through the local measurement, CR users can estimate the channel conditions such as capacity, bit error rate (BER), delay and jitter. In order to describe the dynamic nature of CR networks, we propose a new metric, primary user activity, defined as the probability of the primary user appearance during the CR user transmission. After the spectrum characterization, the CR network chooses the best spectrum bands through the following spectrum operations. the CR network uses multi-spectrum transmission based on OFDM technology. This decision process can be modeled as an optimizaiton problem.

In this project, a QoS aware spectrum decision framework is proposed to determine a set of spectrum bands by considering the application requirements as well as the dynamic nature of spectrum bands as shown in Figure 4. Specifically, for real-time applications, a minimum variance-based spectrum decision (MVSD) is proposed so as to minimize the capacity variance of the decided spectrums subject to the capacity constraint. Furthermore, a maximum capacity-based spectrum decision (MCSD) is proposed for the best effort applications where spectrum bands are decided to maximize the total throughput. Moreover, a dynamic admission control scheme is developed to decide on the spectrum bands adaptively dependent on the time-varying CR network capacity.

Figure 4. Spectrum decision framework for cognitive radio networks.

Related work:

  • W. Y. Lee, and I. F. Akyildiz, "A Spectrum Decision Framework for Cognitive Radio Networks," Submitted for journal publication, Jul. 2008.

 


Inter-Cell Spectrum Sharing in Cognitive Radio Networks

Cognitive radio (CR) networking achieves high utilization of the scarce spectrum resources without causing any performance degradation to the licensed users. Since the spectrum availability varies over time and space, the infrastructure-based CR networks are required to have a dynamic inter-cell spectrum sharing capability. This allows fair resource allocation as well as capacity maximization and avoids the starvation problems seen in the classical spectrum sharing approaches. In this paper, a joint spectrum and power allocation framework is proposed that addresses these concerns by (i) opportunistically negotiating additional spectrum based on the licensed user activity (exclusive allocation), and (ii) having a share of reserved spectrum for each cell (common use sharing). Our algorithm accounts for the maximum cell capacity, minimizes the interference caused to neighboring cells, and protects the licensed users through a sophisticated power allocation method.

Figure 5. Inter-Cell Spectrum Sharing Framework.

Infrastructure-based CR networks are required to provide two different types of spectrum sharing schemes: intra-spectrum sharing and inter-spectrum sharing. In order to share spectrum resource efficiently, CR networks necessitate a unified framework to support cooperation among inter- and intra-cell spectrum sharing schemes and other spectrum management functions. Figure 5 shows the proposed framework for spectrum sharing in infrastructurebased CR networks, which consists of inter-cell spectrum sharing, intra-cell spectrum sharing, and event monitoring.

  • Event Monitoring: The event monitoring has two different functionalities. One is to detect the PU activities, called spectrum sensing. CR users sense the radio environment continuously and send monitoring results to their base-station. Here we assume the periodic sensing which has separate time slots for sensing and transmission. In addition, CR users monitor the quality-of-service (QoS) of their transmission. According to the detected event type, the base-station determines the spectrum sharing strategies and allocates the spectrums to each user adaptively to the radio environments.
     
  • Cell Spectrum Sharing: The intra-cell spectrum sharing enables the base-station to avoid the interference to the primary networks as well as to maintain the QoS of its CR users by allocating spectrum resource adaptively to the event detected inside its coverage. If a new CR user appears in this cell, the base-station determines its acceptance and selects the best available spectrum band if it is admitted. Furthermore, when some of its CR users cannot maintain the guaranteed QoS or lose their connections due to the PU activities, the base-station should re-allocate the spectrum resource to them immediately. Also a CR MAC protocol is required to allow multiple CR users to access to the same spectrum band. The intra-cell spectrum sharing has been widely investigated in many literatures and is out of the scope in this project.
     
  • Inter-Cell Spectrum Sharing: In CR networks, the available spectrum bands vary over time and space which makes it difficult to provide reliable spectrum allocation. Especially in the infrastructure-based networks, the inter-cell interference also needs to be considered in spectrum sharing so as to maximize the network capacity. In the proposed framework, the inter-cell spectrum sharing is comprised of two subfunctionalities: spectrum allocation and power allocation. In the spectrum allocation, the base-station determines its spectrum bands by considering the geographical information of primary networks and current radio activities. The power allocation enables the base-station to determine the transmission power of its assigned spectrum bands so as to maximize the cell capacity without interference to the primary network. When the service quality of the cell becomes worse or is below the guaranteed level, the base-station initiates the inter-cell spectrum sharing and adjusts its spectrum allocation. Based on the spectrum allocation, the base-station determines its transmission power over the allocated spectrum bands.

Related work:

  • W. Y. Lee, and I. F. Akyildiz, "Joint Spectrum and Power Allocation for Inter-Cell Spectrum Sharing in Cognitive Radio Networks," in Proc. of IEEE DySPAN 2008, Chicago, IL, USA, Oct. 2008.

 


Spectrum Mobility for Cognitive Radio Networks

Cognitive radio (CR) networks have been proposed as a solution to both spectrum inefficiency and spectrum scarcity problems. However, they face to several challenges based on the fluctuating nature of the available spectrum as well as the diverse service requirements of various applications. Especially in CR cellular networks, CR users are traversing across multiple cells having heterogeneous spectrum availability. Furthermore, CR users should switch to a new spectrum band when the licensed user appears in the spectrum, the so-called spectrum mobility. Because of these dynamic spectrum environments, it is more complicated to maintain a reliable and seamless communication channels in CR cellular networks.

Figure 6. Mobility Management Framework.

In this paper, we propose a spectrum-aware mobility management scheme for CR cellular networks, which supports seamless mobile communications by considering the joint influence of user and spectrum mobilities. More specifically, to mitigate heterogeneous spectrum availability, a novel CR cellular network architecture based on a spectrum pooling concept is introduced. Based on this architecture, a unified mobility management framework is proposed so as to support diverse mobility events in CR networks, consisting of inter-cell resource allocation, spectrum and user mobility management functions as shown in Figure 6. Inter-cell resource allocation enables each cell to share spectrum resources with its neighbor cells for efficient mobility management. To improve cell capacity under time-varying spectrum environment, a spectrum mobility management scheme is developed, where the CR network determines the proper spectrums and target cells for CR users by exploiting both current spectrum utilization and the stochastic connectivity model. In a user mobility management scheme, a switching costbased handoff decision mechanism is proposed so as to minimize quality degradation caused by user mobility. Simulation results show that the proposed methods can achieve better performance in terms of both cell capacity as well as mobility support in communications.

Related work:

  • W. Y. Lee and I. F. Akyildiz, "Spectrum-Aware Mobility Managewment in Cognitive Radio Networks," submitted for publication, May 2009.

 


You are visitor:

since 06/30/2006